QuickBuild functionality allows you to update installers in a few seconds, Time Saving Functionality: For advanced users, a friendly XML project format supports source control integration,Ĭollaborative development and customizing projects both by hand and using external scripts.Ī command line interface allows you to automate and integrate the building process. On all platforms, even for end users without previous Linux experience.Įase of Development: InstallBuilder includes an easy to learn, easy to use GUI environment.ĭesign, build and test installers with the click of a button. Truly native code and do not require bundling a Java Runtime Environment.Įase of Use: InstallBuilder installers provide an intuitive and easy to use interface Unlike competing products, all InstallBuilder installers are No External Dependencies: InstallBuilder installers are single-file, self-contained native executables with noĮxternal dependencies and minimal overhead. Self-extraction step, reducing download, startup and installation time.īuilt-in LZMA support provides great compression ratios. Optimized: InstallBuilder installers are optimized in size and speed and do not require a Multiplatform Support: InstallBuilder installers are native binaries that can run on Windows, OS X and Linux and most otherįlavors of Unix, including FreeBSD, OpenBSD, AIX, OS/400, HP-UX and IRIX.ĭesktop Integration: InstallBuilder installers provide native look and feel andĭesktop integration for Windows, OS X and Linux (KDE and Gnome). In those cases, InstallBuilder provides a choice between the most common toolkits, Qt and GTK, as On Linux and other Unix platforms, there is not a single Underlying system libraries for displaying their GUI interfaces, so users get a native look and feel forĮach platform the installers run on, such as Windows and Mac OS X. Installers created with InstallBuilder use the Some Java-based installers can take up to minutes to initialize for large installers. InĪddition to this, the installers do not perform a self-extraction step, meaning that they start up instantaneously, whereas Installer introduces is very small, typically around 2 to 3 Mb, versus the 15 Mb to 20 Mb that a bundled JRE requires. InstallBuilder are native applications that do not require any runtime to be present in the system to run. So, how does InstallBuilder address these issues? Installers generated with The above is not intended as a rant against Java-based installers, rather as an illustration of the challenges that a cross End-users react much more favorably to setup applications that are responsiveĪnd provide a familiar native interface, even if the functionality is identical. Performance and lack of a truly native look-and-feel. Finally, andĪlthough alternative toolkits like SWT finally emerged, Java GUI development has traditionally suffered from poor For large installers, this can be a time-consuming step andĪnother source of installation-related issues if the end-user runs out of disk space during this process. Java-based installers also require a self-extraction step, in which theįiles are first unpacked to disk before installation can begin. Significantly the footprint of the installation. Machine, which increases the chances of something going wrong if one is not present or the one present is not a suitable version.Īlternatively, if the user decides to bundle a JRE with the installer in order to avoid these potential problems, it will increase For example, it requires a Java runtime environment to be present in the Major drawbacks when the goal is to create setup programs. Scenarios and indeed over half of your users use InstallBuilder to package Java-based applications. These were built using the Java programming language. To fully understand the architecture and capabilities of InstallBuilder, it is useful to consider the previous generation ofĬross-platform installers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |